>>65376I'm going to copy paste what I've written in other threads as to what I believe. Keep in mind I don't seek to convince anybody. Make your own judgement.
The whole "white race" angle is a wholly American thing (as I've said before) based on skin color rather than on actual genetic heritage. Germany for the germans, France for the french, Sweden for the Swedish. Again, National Socialism isn't for the interests of a vague pseudo "white race" but for its own ethnic race, in Hitler's particular case, the Germans. Its why he cared for his German people rather than for whatever vague concept a "white race" is. To me it feels like, when I hear the term "white race" I immediately think controlled opposition, whether intentional or not. It only does two things, divide people who should name together against the common enemy, and purport that there is some form of unifying "white race" when in fact Europe is made of a diverse set of people with different genetic makeup that should be preserved (not diverse as in non European but as in how the French have long noses or the Germans have strong jawlines). Of course I also seek to preserve the culture therein that is tied to ones ethnicity and race.
Race is more than skin color and I don't want each European ethnicity to lose their individual genetic traits because some mixed American thinks they should. Brits are different from German, different from Swedes who are different from French. Each has differing genetic traits and cultures that should never mix because it dilutes the original cultures.
What white nationalists fail to understand is that white nationalism is still multicultural. They're globalists who pretend to be nationalist but wouldn't mind if all of Europe lost its individual genetic makeup and uniqueness so long as they had white skin. Americans lack any ethnic background thus they lack ethnic culture. Even if America was all white, it would still be a multiculture of different European ethnicities. Multiculturalism doesn't work under any circumstance be it all white or not.
The National Socialists weren't the "evil racists" that the jew media has told you to believe. Just because you're against miscegenation and multiculturalism doesn't mean you harbor hatred towards other races, it just means you want to preserve your own, and in Hitler's case, it means you wish the other races would do the same and enjoy the fruits of Ethnic Nationalism the Germans enjoyed. The National Socialists were the anti racists because they knew, at least Hitler and many of his top in command knew, that if the races fought against each other rather than fighting in unison against the common enemy, true peace would never be achieved. Mindlessly hating other races just because they have been used as golems, same as the whites, accomplishes nothing and only furthers the jew's goal to make sure everyone is fighting amongst each other so that the jews can quietly proceed as usual behind the scenes.
That's just a slicer of what I've written in the past. And as the images convey I don't hate the whole of other races (except the Jew, there's something about them where each and every single one is genetically pre disposed to be a liar and deviant, NEVER fall for the 'Not all Jews' angle, for ALL Jews are deceptive). I am against miscegenation and multiculturalism not because I hate the other races, but because I want to preserve the diversity and beauty of the Human species. Diversity in both looks and culture, however diversity can only exist through seperation of the different races and cultures.
>>65378Yes and no. You are correct that the term is used deceptively, however in this particular case I wasn't mentioning the Jew as anyone can be a Globalist, or believe in a universal government.